A common question we are asked by company operational stakeholder is: “how much savings will we achieve by conducting a Power Factor Correction?“
Unfortunately, there’s no single, definitive answer to the average savings a company can expect from power factor correction (PFC). Here’s why:
-
Variable Factors: Savings depend heavily on several factors, including:
- Baseline Power Factor: Companies with a very low power factor (below 0.8) will likely see more significant savings than those with a power factor closer to 1 (ideal).
- Utility Rates: The specific penalty structure for low power factor imposed by the local utility company significantly impacts savings. Some utilities have steeper penalties than others.
- Energy Consumption: Companies with higher overall energy usage will see a larger potential cost reduction from PFC.
-
-
- Increased Capacity: Reduced reactive power allows existing electrical infrastructure to handle more load, potentially delaying expensive upgrades.
- Improved Equipment Life: Lower currents due to PFC reduce stress on electrical components, potentially extending their lifespan.
Focus on Efficiency: While cost savings are a major benefit, PFC’s primary focus is improving overall electrical system efficiency. This translates to:
-
Key Takeaway:
The best way to estimate potential savings from PFC is to conduct a power factor assessment. Energy Efficiency Group can analyze your facility’s specific energy usage, power factor, and recommend action steps.
If you suspect a low power factor might be an issue, don’t hesitate! Contact Energy Efficiency Group to begin the conversation.